Disputed Appraisal

 

Case Study: Disputed Appraisal Between Auto Damage Appraiser and Repair Shop

Background: A customer’s vehicle sustained significant damage in a collision, and an auto damage appraiser conducted an assessment of the damage. The repair shop, however, disagrees with the appraiser’s assessment and believes that additional repair work is necessary, which is not included in the initial appraisal.

Steps to Address the Dispute and Reach a Resolution:

  1. Review the Original Appraisal:
    • Start by carefully reviewing the auto damage appraiser’s initial assessment and estimation. Ensure that it accurately reflects the damage observed during the inspection.
  2. Open Communication:
    • Contact the repair shop to discuss their concerns and the specific areas of disagreement. Listen attentively to their perspective and ask for any supporting documentation they may have.
  3. Clarify Expectations:
    • Clearly communicate to the repair shop the standards and guidelines used in the initial appraisal. Discuss the scope of work that was included and any assumptions made during the assessment.
  4. Reinspection of the Vehicle:
    • Schedule a reinspection of the vehicle with the repair shop’s personnel and the auto damage appraiser. Conduct a thorough examination of the disputed areas to understand the nature and extent of the damage.
  5. Documentation:
    • Document the findings during the reinspection, including photographs and notes. This documentation will serve as a basis for any adjustments or amendments to the initial appraisal.
  6. Review Supporting Evidence:
    • Evaluate any additional evidence presented by the repair shop, such as repair manuals, manufacturer specifications, or expert opinions. Compare this evidence with the original appraisal.
  7. Discussion and Negotiation:
    • Engage in open and constructive discussions with the repair shop’s representatives. Explore potential compromises and solutions that align with industry standards and safety requirements.
  8. Consultation with the Insurance Company:
    • If necessary, consult with the customer’s insurance company to discuss the dispute and potential adjustments to the claim. The insurance company may provide guidance or additional resources to resolve the issue.
  9. Amendment of the Appraisal:
    • If it is determined that additional repairs are indeed required based on the reinspection and supporting evidence, the auto damage appraiser should amend the initial appraisal to reflect the necessary changes.
  10. Final Resolution Agreement:
    • Once a resolution is reached, ensure that all parties, including the repair shop, the appraiser, and the customer (if applicable), are in agreement with the revised appraisal and scope of work.
  11. Quality Control and Oversight:
    • After the resolution, maintain oversight to ensure that the repair work is conducted in accordance with the revised appraisal and industry standards. Monitor progress and quality to safeguard the customer’s interests.
  12. Documentation of Resolution:
    • Document the final resolution agreement, including any changes to the appraisal, scope of work, and costs. Provide copies to all relevant parties for reference.
  13. Customer Communication:
    • Keep the customer informed throughout the resolution process. Explain any changes to the repair plan, costs, or timelines to ensure transparency and customer satisfaction.
  14. Post-Repair Inspection:
    • After the repairs are completed, conduct a final inspection to confirm that the work meets the revised appraisal standards and industry requirements.
  15. Feedback and Improvement:
    • Collect feedback from all parties involved to identify opportunities for process improvement and preventive measures to avoid similar disputes in the future.

______

________

By following these steps, the auto damage appraiser can address the dispute, ensure a fair resolution, and uphold ethical standards while prioritizing the safety and satisfaction of the customer. Effective communication, documentation, and a willingness to collaborate are key factors in resolving such disputes successfully.